We lose patience waiting for someone else to destroy a dangerous piece of ordnance.
Several years back I watched child scrap collectors use rudimentary metal detectors to search for bomb fragments that they could sell to garner spending money. The kidsā behavior around unexploded ordnance was reckless and, like most youths around the world, they defined an accident as āsomething unfortunate that happens to other peopleā. After several hours, I told my friend Yai, āLetās get out of here before somebody blows us upā.
Two weeks later I was back in that village to meet with the parents of two teens who were killed days earlier when they attempted to scrape mud off an odd device they found but couldnāt identify. What killed the two boys was a āboosterā from inside a large, aircraft-delivered bomb. As the term implies, a bombās booster (not much larger than a soda can but filled with high explosive) is intended to detonate along with the bombās nose fuse and contribute to the detonation of the canisterās main charge.
Ever since that accident Iāve been well aware of the damage a booster alone can inflict and, whenever I encounter a seemingly empty bomb casing, I check to see if one might be lurking within. Iāve been rewarded a surprising number of times.
Three years ago, in Dak Ran village, I spotted a fractured bomb casing with a dented but intact booster ā it looked, perhaps not innocent, but far from sinister. Knowing the danger that the device posed should someone tamper with it, or a grass fire heat up the casing, I immediately referred the bomb to the organization tasked to destroy dangerous items in or near that village.
(Keep reading and youāll learn why Iāve chosen to not name that organization; it wouldnāt be fair to tar an entire organization with a brush intended for just a few irresponsible employees.)
Three years after my referral, I happened upon the same bomb sitting in the same village where Iād encountered it previously. When I asked villagers whether any staff from the responsible organization had inspected the device they told me that deminers had visited, but had refused to destroy the booster unless the man who claimed the casing renounced ownership. (The deminersā intent was to destroy the booster and then truck the empty casing to the local scrap yard, sell it, and pocket Lao currency equal to twenty or thirty US dollars).
The farmer refused to surrender the casing and the deminers departed, telling him: āYou keep the casing; you can keep the booster, too.ā
One could quibble over who was most responsible putting people of the village at risk: the deminers for being greedy for pocket money or, the farmer for beingā¦wellā¦come to think of itā¦equally greedy for pocket money. The sad reality is that, often, responsible parties like the farmer and the deminers escape injury while some innocent soul is killed as a consequence of standing in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Yesterday, we broke the impasse. We didnāt ask anyoneās permission; we didnāt bargain. We showed up unannounced, gingerly lifted the casing onto the bed of our pickup and slowly, carefully trucked it into the countryside. Then, we slapped a wad of C4 high explosive onto the booster, retreated a few hundred meters and blew it to bits. We then loaded the casing back in our truck and returned it to, perhaps, the most bull-headed farmer in Sekong Province.
Did we reward a stubborn farmer for putting his neighbors at risk? Frankly, Scarlet⦠(Sometimes, I simply lack the patience to ponder moral imperatives).